Human-level reasoning is the holy grail of AI.

“Can I trust it?
We don’t expect hallucinations to go away.”

Bret Greenstein
Principal, Data and Analytics
PWC

“Ensuring a level of transparency on the algorithmic decision-making process is critical... and the black box problem is just one of many risks...”

Bhaskar Chakravorti
Dean of Global Business at Tufts University
Harvard Business Review

“We have to get to a point where the answer that you get you largely trust and I think that we're several years away from being able to do that.”

JENSEN HUANG
CEO
nvidia

Our mission is to bring human-level reasoning to complex enterprise applications and workflows that demand the highest precision and accuracy.

The first accurate neurosymbolic engine

Actual reasoning,
clear results.

When it comes to reasoning, Reasoner delivers clarity where others fall short.

Here’s an example: The surgeon riddle

The surgeon, who is the boy's father, says, "I can't operate on this boy, he's my son!" Who is the surgeon to the boy?

Thinking
Thought for 23 seconds

The surgeon is the boy's grandfather.

Here's the reasoning:

The surgeon is described as the boy's father.

When the surgeon says, "I can't operate on this boy, he's my son!", it implies that the boy is his son.
Therefore, the boy's father (the surgeon) refers to the boy as "my son."

This means that the surgeon is both the boy's father and refers to the boy's father as "my son," indicating that the surgeon is actually the boy's grandfather.

Answer: His grandfather—the surgeon is the boy’s grandfather.
Reasoning
Reasoned
Data Analysis
Reasoning
Reasoned
Data Analysis

Benchmark-beating reasoning

A data-driven analysis of Reasoner’s engine’s performance using Google’s FRAMES benchmark shows Reasoner excels at factuality, retrieval accuracy, and complex reasoning.

77.3%


ACCURACY

92.8%


accuracy achieved

847


tasks correct

913


Total Reasoning Tasks

1,647


Total Sources Used

Outperforming in every category

Reasoner's engine delivers unmatched results across all types of reasoning.
Assessment
Type
TOTAL
ASSESSMENTS
REASONER %
Raw Score
OPENAI o1 %
Raw Score
Numerical Reasoning 121 93.5 71.1
Tabular Reasoning 151 87.5 78.1
Multiple Constraints 400 93.5 79.3
POST PROCESSING 71 94.4 73.2
TEMPORAL Reasoning 170 94.7 78.2
Total 913 92.8 77.3
Reasoner
For applications that demand the highest precision and accuracy.

Knowledge
Consistency

Reasoner’s surpasses o1 on all reasoning assessments

End-to-End
Traceability

Every decision explained, every action auditable

Low Cost to
Operate

More value, less complexity

supported by

Get access to the private beta today.